Social media is full of the semiannual carping about all aspects of moving the clocks. Lots of people have no idea which is Daylight Saving Time and which is Standard Time, they just know that it's stupid and they hate it.
I never gave much thought to Daylight Relocating Time until I started riding a bike a lot. When I was training to race, I had to calculate whether I had enough daylight for a training ride after work. When I was commuting -- and I still do -- I have to decide whether to risk riding in dusk and darkness. The jet lag aspect didn't "dawn" on me until I was over 50.
Human time is an artificial grid laid over natural time. Plants and animals respond to light and darkness. Humans do too, which causes most of the friction between metered time in general, and mandated displacements of the schedule in particular. Since humans already have the constant stress of accommodating artificial time, which goes unnoticed because it has been normalized for generations, the extra squeeze of switching the clocks provokes whines and squeals. Especially now that the Internet can broadcast and magnify such things, it has become a spring and fall bitchfest that has even led to legislative proposals to stay sprung forward or hold back and make Standard Time the unalterable standard.
With so-called Standard Time only in effect from the first Sunday in November to the second week of March, the so-called Daylight Time has become the de facto standard, because it occupies more of the year. If we were to stay one way or the other, I would prefer the later sunset, although I have a lot of trouble waking up when it's still dark out. Who invented that anyway? And who was the sadistic bastard who came up with the alarm clock, to yank a person from blissful slumber when they are clearly not ready?
No doubt, hunters and gatherers who woke up and got themselves into position before the morning light were more successful than the ones who strolled out after brunch to see what might be available. This transferred to agricultural societies, and then to industrial ones. But there's no avoiding the change in daylight from winter to summer solstices. When we lived according to the daylight alone, how far you pushed into the darkness at either end was somewhat up to you. Now that we have to punch a clock, the discrepancies have more of an impact.
If we did not change to Daylight Relocating Time, first light in the peak of day length would begin at about 3 a.m., and sunrise would follow at about 4 a.m. in northern locations in the Lower 48 of the USA. Your local time depends on where you are in your time zone. The western edge can differ significantly from the eastern edge. The sunlight moves smoothly across the chunked-up human boundaries in which we try to corral time and domesticate it. Thing is, we can tag it with a number, but it always manages to escape.
If we stay on Daylight Relocating Time, sunrise in the dark months of November, December, and January would be pushing 9 a.m. in some places that are northerly and westerly in their zones, like Seattle. It would be solidly after 8 a.m. most places.
When the Bush administration pushed the start of Daylight Relocating Time well into March, I was initially lured into the general griping, because sunrise was finally coming early enough to bring a hopeful feeling of spring to the mornings. The clock change two weeks into March knocked our sunrise back to January, while turning the afternoons into detached pieces of April, brightly lit but still cold. It increased opportunities to exercise outdoors after work, but March being March the conditions out there weren't always very inviting. But as the winters have rapidly weakened overall, it's starting to turn into bike season. Just remember that cold weather can return, and big dumps of dense, clumpy snow can ruin everything. March snow, except at what passes for high elevations in New England, can be too sticky to ski on, but too persistent to ignore when trying to get out on the roads.
Even when the time change waited until April the saying was that there wasn't much to look at, but plenty of light to see it by.
Whatever the clock says, it's hard to see the light go, and a welcome sight when it returns. Most people can agree on that.
Medieval time altered the hour lengths throughout the year. Worked according to the daylight available, long hours in the summer to make hay whilst the sun shone and hibernate through the dark days of winter.
ReplyDeleteI would totally go for a time system based around the natural cycle of light and darkness. Or at least a work system that took it into account.
ReplyDeleteThe Romans said the day started at sunrise, whenever that happened to be.
ReplyDeleteI used to be one of those people who hated the return to Standard Time. It seemed that having that, then Thanksgiving, Christmas, my birthday and Valentine's Day all before the return to DST was just too much to bear. Then I started working a schedule in which I woke at 5:30 to get to the office by 7, to prepare what the rest of the team would need when they arrived at 8. I did this for three years. In those years I would have preferred to stay on Standard Time all year.
After that team was disbanded, and I was on my own again and home-based again, I experimented with matching my waking hours more closely with nature. I set my alarm for sunrise each day as it moved. Sometimes I used the beginning of civil twilight. It wasn't really workable because there's so much variation in sunrise times during the year. But it was interesting to try.
It has long occurred to me that it would make more sense to simply change work ours seasonally than it does to change the clocks. But the clocks rule.